Types of Voice Recognition Systems

Systems other than the speaker dependent  and speaker independent include discrete speech recognition. Here the user has to make pauses between words in order for the system to recognize each word. One such platform is the Kukarella audio transcription tool.  The continued speech recognition has a mechanism that enables it to understand words at any normal talking rate. Other systems such as the natural language can answer various questions asked to it.

After identifying how the sound recognition works, various types and applications, it is relevant to identify its importance. The advantages are broad and work becomes more efficient. This is because the time used in processing documents becomes shorter. Documents can be generated up to four times faster with voice recognition compared to when you are typing instead. The first ASR (automatic speech recognition) device was used in 1952 and recognized single digits spoken by a user (it was not computer driven). Today, ASR programs are used in many industries, including healthcare, military (e.g., F-16 fighter jets), telecommunications, and personal computing (i.e. hands-free computing). That is how fast the world is moving and embracing this new technology to ease work. 

Importance of voice recognition

Voice recognition has a number of benefits and drawbacks tied to it. Looking at the benefits just helps us understand how important this is, here are a number of them:

The application of voice recognition saves on labor. For example, you can save a lot of cash, which you spend nowadays on secretaries. Voice transcription tool is quick and efficient. Many staff would be needed to handle documentation, typing and to perform other office related duties. With voice recognition, few staff would be needed to perform tasks like typing. The speech recognition is a self-taught system: the more you use it, the more it learns and will definitely help out more. So a frequent user of this voice recognition systems has a lot to benefit from it in the long run.

Speech recognition sometimes comes with legal vocabulary depending on the design. This is beneficial to lawmakers and legal consultants. Other professions can still make use of the voice recognition systems by simply having the systems programmed to suit their various demands. Consultants and other people like doctors who need to use the profession bound terminologies can find this so beneficial.

Speech recognition can be used to break the boredom that is associated with too much typing. You can dictate words that will be transformed into texts. That is so much fun and a motivation that can make you work even faster. This encourages effectiveness and leads into a more structured work and clears routine.

Who can use this voice recognition systems?

Any person who wishes to dictate or give commands to the voice recognition systems can benefit from it. If you are doing your own writing, then definitely you will need this speech recognition. For any profession, lawyers, attorneys, managers, accountants and journalist, this system are ideal. With little training for the complex systems or manuals from the less complicated ones, anyone can use these systems. On your PC, the spoken words will definitely be transformed into a text right in front of your eyes as if its magic. This is what Kukarella voice to text converter actually doing.

It’s easy to correct errors when you are using the voice recognition systems. As stated earlier, the systems keep learning and when you make mistakes and keeps correcting them, the system keeps improving itself, developing more vocabulary. This allows you to compose documents such as emails, reports and surveys even faster The best part is that this system can be designed according to your specifications. You therefore have no need to panic as the system will be designed to cover all you want.

Drawbacks of voice recognition systems

Voice recognition systems and audio transcription tools are not perfect yet. This means that there are still imperfections that the users can experience. 

Sometimes, a lack of accuracy and misinterpretation might cause errors. Voice recognition can interpret our voices into texts but may display or interpret our word is a different way from what we intended. Such word may be confusing, this includes words like there and their, or this and these.

You will need to invest more time to build up a powerful voice recognition system. This means you will have to be patient with the system, allocate more resources towards developing it and give it frequent and adequate maintenance. You must train your system in the best way possible for future efficiency. This training should include finding the right speed to give commands to the system while allowing the system to produce correct spelling, grammar, and even sentence structure. 

When it comes to accents, the system may have some problems too. You have to learn how to give commands in a systematic way without changing accents that will impact the efficiency of the system. This programs may also have problems recognizing commands especially when the user is affected by respiratory diseases such as cold, cough or sore troth. To effectively give command, you have to minimize background noises. This will allow the system to clearly capture the command and give correct feedback that is free from any mix-up and errors. A user should also limit the time he/she spends taking to these voice recognition systems. For instance, talking too much may result in some personal problems.

It’s only a matter of time before better systems are introduced. We can make our work in the offices less boring and even more efficient by using the available voice recognition systems, such as kukarella. We  can utilize some of the benefits that come with advancement in technology to simplify our work. One way is by embracing the use of voice recognition systems.All in all, it remains clear that voice recognition is a key component in our current world. Embracing it is all we ought to do. Using the right tool guarantees better results that meet all your needs.  


1. Abe, M., Hakoda, K., and Tsukada, H. (1996). An information retrieval system from text database using text-to-speech.Proc. AVIOS’96, pp. 189–196.

2. Charpentier, F. and Moulines, E. (1989). Pitch synchronous waveform processing techniques for text-to-speech synthesis using diphones.Proc. Eurospeech’89, pp. 13–19.

3. Darrel, S. and Bernie, R. (1994). DEC talk software in a desktop environment.Proc. AVIOS’94, pp. 189–193.

4. Hakoda, K., Nakajima, S., Hirokawa, T., and Mizuno, H. (1990). A new Japanese text-to-speech synthesizer based on COC synthesized method.Proc. ICSLP’90, pp. 809–812.

5. Hakoda, K., Hirokawa, T., Tsukada, H., Yoshida, Y., and Mizuno, H. (1995). Japanese text-to-speech software based on waveform concatenation method.Proc. AVIOS’95, pp. 65–72.

6. Hirokawa, T., Itoh, K., and Sato, H. (1993). High quality speech synthesis system based on waveform concatenation of phoneme segment. IEICE Trans. Fundamentals, E76-A (11): 1964–1970.

7. Imamura, A. and Suzuki, Y. (1990). Speaker-independent word spotting and a tranputer-based implementation.Proc. ICSLP’90, pp. 537–540.

8. Intoh, K. and Miki, S. (1988). Speaker independent isolated word recognition board and its application.American Voice I/O Systems Applications Conf., AVIOS’88.

9. Itakura, F. (1975). Line spectrum representation of linear prediction coefficients of speech signal.Trans. of the Committee on Speech Research, ASJ, S75-34.

10. Itakura, F. and Saito, S. (1969). Speech analysis-synthesis system based on the partial autocorrelation coefficient. Acoust. Soc. of Japan Meeting, pp. 199–200 (in Japanese).

11. Minami, Y, Shikano, K., Yamada, T., and Matsuoka, T. (1992). Very-large-vocabulary continuous speech recognition system for telephone directory assistance. Proc. IVTTA’92.

12. Momosaki, K., Hara, Y., Shiga, Y., Kaseno, O., Tamanaka, N., Nitta, T., and Kobayashi, K. (1994). A Japanese TTS software for personal computers.ASJ’94 Autumn Meeting.3-5-6, pp. 327–328 (in Japanese).

13. Sato, H., Sagisaka, Y, Kogure, K., and Sagayama, S. (1982). Investigation on Japanese text-to-speech conversion. Trans. of the Committee on Speech Research, S82-08 (in Japanese).

14. J. and Sagayama, S. (1994). Fast telephone channel adaptation based on vector field smoothing technique. Proc. IVTTA’94 Workshop, pp. 97–100.

15. Takahashi, J. and Sagayama, S. (1995). Vector-field-smoothed bayesian learning for incremental speaker adaptation. Proc. ICASSP95 (Detroit), pp. 696–699.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *